Find a Lawyer

ISHRAT ULLAH KHAN versus HAJI ALI AKBAR

Section 5A, 13 (2) (i) and 15 in the payment of rent to the tenant by default the evicted tenant did not pay the rent in the case of settlement to the landlord and the landlord in the first period of litigation Had reached between The rent was increased in accordance with Section 5A of the West Pakistan Urban Rent Regulation Ordinance 1959 where the rent would automatically increase after 3 years, fixed by the tenant controller and appellate authority despite the tenant receiving legal notice. Both were rightly ordered to be removed on a paroled basis. Interference in finding the truth of the following forums in rent payment can only be done by the High Court, when the evidence was misread and the finding of reconciliation was based on mujahidin and speculation, or unacceptable evidence. Based on whether there was an error or defects in the procedure that may have introduced errors or omissions in the qualifying decision, the tenant failed to identify any evidence that was misread or read. Was not hired by the controller or appellate authority and could not identify any such principle. The work, which was to have been infringed, but not against the Community following forums we may not be high interfering source in search of harmony, the appeal court immigration advocates from Mingora lawyer