Find a Lawyer

SULTAN versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ

Following the trial of the trial for the specific sale of the Section 12 contract, after the trial, the parties excluded the claim that the documents were relied upon by the plaintiffs on behalf of the executor. It was not legally enforceable, but the appellate court rejected the suit containing the agreement to sell and receive the contract. The appellate court correctly executed a large amount of money which relied heavily on the script statement which stated that the lucrative money was prepared by the defendants for the seller / executor, but he Failed to deal with the admission that he did not know the officer. Personally, such factors will negatively affect the case of the plaintiffs from whom the stamp papers were purchased if they were not submitted for evidence by the plaintiffs, not paid in the presence of the certified author specified by them. And the trial court rightly dismissed it under other testimony. The appellate court failed to properly interpret the evidence on material facts in view of the material contradictions in the witnesses and defendants' statements with Reg, and was the first to misinterpret and misinterpret the evidence based on the record in court. The appellate court had set aside the judgment and judgment in the second appeal and the trial court was reinstated. list of advocates from Kashmir lawyer