THE COMMANDING OFFICER, NATIONAL LOGISTIC CELL versus RAZA ENTERPRISES
Sections 42 and 54 of the Sindh Urban State Land (Allotment, Conversion and Cancellation of Ordinance) Ordinance (III of 2001), Sections 3 and 4 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OXXX, RR1 and 2 of the Suite of Declaration. And the plaintiff seeking cancellation of the permanent allotment of land allotment sought a declaration of the title in connection with the property that they had purchased from their allottee. The authorities resisted the claim that the suit land was transferred to the authority. He is in the possession of the plaintiff but authorities have failed to establish any document. The court has accepted the plaintiff's request for interim injunction and restrained the plaintiffs (authorities) from their right to prevent them from taking any harsh action. The plaintiff claimed that the lease in favor of the original allotment had been canceled. Ordinance CE, 2001, under section 3 of Sindh Urban Estate Land, Ordinance CE, 2001, the decree issued to the plaintiff misidentified section 3 (allotment, conversion and exchange cancellation) ordinance 2001 There was no doubt that the allotment of state land at rates below market value would be canceled. But under section 4 (2) of the said ordinance, the committee needs to inquire to determine if it is really the section 3 (allotment, conversion and exchange) ordinance of the Sindh Urban State Land Ordinance Market. The allotment was made at a rate lower than the value, 2001, the first entity to be implemented after the determination of the market value at the relevant time under section 4 (2) of the Ordinance 2001, Urban Civil Land (cancellation of provisions, conversion and exchange). May be, even if al
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Kallur Kot lawyer