SHEIKH IMRAN LIAQUAT HUSSAIN versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL-1
Representing Articles 12 and 14 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) of the People's Act 1976, Article 199 Constitution Petition to reject the nomination on the basis that the candidate was not proposed and voted by the constituent voters Was supported. Representation of the Public Act, 1976, provided that only one member of the constituent assembly is proposed or seconded to be a member and to sign proposals and secondaries on nomination papers under section 12 (2) of the said Act. Need The provisions of Section 14 (3) of the Representation People Act, 1976, gave the Returning Officer, on his own motion or any objection, the authority to conduct such summary inquiry when it deems fit and reject the nomination papers. That the proposer or the second papers were not eligible for the nomination, the candidate believes that the returning officer under Proteo (ii) used his discretionary powers in section 14 (3) (d) of the Public Representation Act, 1976 I was allowed to replace the second, it was terminated because the Providence Returning Officer mentioned above could only allow correction of this defect. Which was not of a special nature, but when the Returning Officer was not able to allow such an alternative in the process of nomination papers, the nomination papers were rejected by the Returning Officer in appropriate circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
