Find a Lawyer

AKHTAR ZAMAN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

The former proceedings on the ex parte order for the recovery of Section 5, 10 and Schedule Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Reintegration Allowance, were enforced by any of the West Pakistan Family Court Act, 1964. Failure to file a written statement on the date of non-submission The Family Court decided the case after recording the evidence of the plaintiff's request for a cancellation order that he did not know about it. And that the court had not exercised the powers conferred on him. After recording the decree, the family court rejected the request, which order was upheld by the appellate court. Accuracy The defendant did not allege in his request to cancel the order that he was not served. The court had proved, therefore, that there was no legal consequence of the summons service or non-service when the defendant, appearing as the plaintiff, stated that the lawyer, who had entered the jurisdiction during the trial. What was it, he was his uncle, with whom his terms were not good. Such facts were later considered, as the petition was not charged to set aside the order. Compare your alleged signatures to the Power of Attorney with your approved signatures from a handwriting expert, but they did not request anything from the Family Court claimant to confirm their statement, which led to these individuals being called as witnesses. Was not presented, from which he allegedly came. The former Parsis know about the decree passed down by the court's finding of evidence. law firms from Naukot lawyer