Find a Lawyer

RASHID AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ

CPC Parties to Civil Procedure Code Order I Suite I1, R8 and Section 115 of the Special Relief Act (1 of 1877), Section 8 and 54 of the representative plaintiffs who claim to be representatives of the village community and to the land. Filed a lawsuit for possession and injunction. The suit was dismissed by the trial court for use by the village community, but the appellate court ruled that the residents of the village could not be dismissed in the absence of mandatory notice. Was. Defendants cannot deny the overwhelming evidence presented by the defendants, which is jointly the property of the village owners according to the land and was received for the welfare of the village community, and the defendants requested Denied that the case had been earlier tried for disobedience. There was a restraining order and they seized the land during the currency. Thus, the defendants were not entitled to arbitrary and equal relief under 5 115; the defendants of the CPC did not challenge the trial court's tricks. That they were to boast of the suit, which is collectively owned by the rural community, was not conclusive. O1, R8, CPC will serve the purpose of issuing the required notice and then proceeding to the trial court to resume the proceedings, for the defendants to take possession of the suit. In the absence of the right of justice, justice was restored to the right of justice. O 1, R 8, CPC was generally mandated by the rural community in the notice provisions, but these immigration advocate from Jandanwala lawyer