Find a Lawyer

MEHFOOZ ALI versus MUHAMMAD MUNIR

In connection with the determination of the pre-custody dispute dispute amount in the pre and pre-pre-trial litigation, the defendant claimed that the sale price of the suit land was fixed and was paid one lakh rupees, according to the defendants. At a trial price of Rs 40,000, the trial court upheld the judgment determining the sale. 000 rupees was successfully proved and the case was dismissed due to reduction of payment of court fees in the High Court. The appellate court in the case is instructed to provide the plaintiff with a reasonable opportunity to meet the reduction of court fees. The High Court has directed in a special remand order that the appellate court decide the appeal without reopening matters relating to the determination of the sale price of the land. The plaintiff, who provided the court fee on the plaintiff, had already decided Rs.1,00,000, appellant C ordered the trial. We have post-remand proceedings. It is settled and the plaintiff has already deposited Rs 40,000, the claimant was obliged to submit Rs. The amount paid is divided in which neither the balance decimal amount nor the amount is ready to be paid; Could not be resolved because they had no time specified by the Balance Deposit Directive, they were prevented from depositing the balance, best law firm from Garh Maharaja lawyer