Find a Lawyer

ZAHIR JAN versus PROVINCE

4, 5, 6 and 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Disappointment, removal from service by adopting the summary procedure provided under R5 (2) of the North West Frontier Province Police (Capacity and Discipline). Allegations) Rolls, 1975 The decision to dismiss appeals from the Service Employees Tribunal of the Government Employees meant that the allegations against public servants required strict compliance with the gravity of the justification. According to the Rules of the Service of the Department, the method of investigation of the case can be punished only on the receipt of a competent authority inquiry record in accordance with the rules for the conclusion of justice. No detailed inquiry was made After receiving a report from the Inquiry Officer, the department should take action against the civil servants. After the transfer of the Inquiry Officer, the detailed action against civil can be finalized. In terms of employees R 5 (3) (4) (5), read the above rules along with RR 6 and 7. The Supreme Court partially granted the order to remove the cases and applicants of the appellants. He was instructed to face detailed action, for which the department has already taken steps. list of supreme court advocates from Village Sunder lawyer