Find a Lawyer

FAROOQ NAWAZ versus DIRECTOR OF C.P. DIRECTORATE, AGS BRANCH, GHQ, RAWALPINDI

R 7 Government Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1973, R4 (1) (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Removal of Job from Absence of Duty Delays Departmental Appeal, Government Employees Removed from condolences 2 1 On appeal for absentee duty from 1997, dismiss the departmental appeal filed on 12 8 2000 after the services of 25 2 1997 because this restriction was maintained by the tribunal of the civil servant. He was involved in the murder case on 5 2 1997. He was released on bail on 92nd 2000 and was acquitted of the charge on 30 6 2000, thus, the time for filing a departmental appeal will start to run from the date of his acquittal and his approval from the date of bail. 7 1 will be absent from 1997. Until the date of his arrest on 5 2 1997, non-submission of leave grant during this period and not joining duty after being granted bail on 9 2 2000 was sufficient to conclude that the employee of the Government. The absence was deliberate and he had no interest in performing. Duty Service Rules does not deny a person charged in a criminal case to perform his duty unless the department is bound to accept leave grant for a period of time after his 1997 dismissal. , When a civil servant was already absent and was removed. 25 2 In 1997, the service dismissed the tribunal's appeal because the departmental appeal was banned when the tribunal deemed it inappropriate for a civil servant because he had no leave in his account. o It is possible for the department to do this without formally applying for an unlawful decision criminal advocate from Domeli lawyer