Sections 230 / / & 34 and 4 364/34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 40 evidence have been appreciated and the assailants were not known and F Neither their names nor their characteristics were given in the IR in the presence of the magistrate through the testimony of the parade prosecution to identify the accused, who had immediately convicted the accused in the courtroom with the victim. Was taken and the body was already fully aware of the incident that cannot be ruled out. Investigating the meaning of Article 40 of the Law Shahadat, 1984, and it has no bearing on the importance of identifying the accused in the court through the prosecution's testimony, no other evidence on record to link the accused to the crime. Acceptance was brought in the form of the defendant's statements / admissions on file, hearing evidence and identifying the location of the incident by the accused, who was a known ally for every body, which does not have to be on record according to the law. Was, for the simple reason that it could influence or influence the mind of the court in reaching a correct decision in this matter, The accused was acquitted in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
