Find a Lawyer

ABDUL AZIZ KHAN NIAZI versus THE STATE

Sections 9 (a) (iv) and (vi), 10 (b), 18 (g) and 24 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3), 199 and 13 (a) guarantee, corruption and corruption are the same. No one can be tried and convicted twice for the same allegations and evidence-based accusations. There is no restriction on tiling separate references in separate transactions on the same charge, but on the same person a second time. Can't be charged. On the basis of the same evidence, a separate trial may be continued in several instances of the same nature of the accused transaction, but in light of the rule that the cause should not be prosecuted twice for the same purpose. In more than one case, the same allegation and the same evidence base, the documents on record will not be legally followed, in the present case, in the context of the legal role of the property involved, a reasonable doubt will be raised. ? In the absence of any allegations of accuracy and consequently, in the absence of any further evidence, it would be difficult to establish the opinion that the accused committed the crime by hiding the assets in the Income Tax Return and giving false information to the Income Tax Department. With that he was. Charged with the avoidance of income tax or was intended to be concealed, unless the prosecution of a person's fault does not satisfy the First Fax Court, its guarantee is merely a crime and necessary indication. Cannot be placed on the basis of The determination of determination in such cases will relate to the true character of the transaction and the nature of the crime that was allegedly committed, unless in the light of the evidence in the hands of the prosecutor in the parameters of the matter expressed. N online advocate from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer