Find a Lawyer

I.T.A. NO. 1056/KB OF 1996-97, DECIDED ON 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2002. versus I.T.A. NO. 1056/KB OF 1996-97, DECIDED ON 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2002.

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 80B, 143B & 2 (3) Tax Interest on Income of Some Contractors and Importers The Appellate Tribunal of the Income Tax Prompt Tax Accreditation did not purchase the assessment ideas under which interest income section 143 Has been announced under b. The Income Tax Ordinance 1979 was properly pending under Section 80B of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 because the Assessment was a fraudulent jurisdiction which was legally covered in Section 80B (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and Section 2 had gone. () ?) Under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, the Company was advised of the free status of other artificial jurists as the person as a person is clearly mission in Section 80 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. Was. The appellate tribunal held that the tax provisions considered under Section 80B of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 were not available to any company nor the interest or profit received by the Company was covered by the section 80B of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. Was not done online advocate from Kumbh lawyer