Find a Lawyer

ABDUR RAHIM ALIAS RAHIMA versus THE STATE

Section 2 302 / Proof of References References filed promptly The ocular testimony of the prosecution witnesses has been substantially stable; no material material can be brought on record during cross-examination. In addition, the testimony was fully supported through the Medo Legal and Post-mortem reports. The two accused and the motive involved in the motive were both admitted in their statements under section 234 under, there was no enmity with the CCPC prosecution witnesses who were brought to the witnesses by eyewitnesses. It was very natural that it was a grand day and Petty was known together. The identification cannot be misconstrued that the blackening of the wound confirms the fact as stated in the FIR The accused fired from the court's witnesses at a distance from the suspects when the suspect reported, and one of them was the person who happened to be. He was the person who transported the deceased to the hospital and could not be broken. He said that the victim, who had taken the victim to the hospital, to support the prosecution's case and the trial court's witness testified that the victim had taken him to the hospital. Before my death, I told the investigating officer that it was the accused who was responsible. The death, which is equivalent to a verbal death declaration by the deceased, which proved that the deceased was executed by the accused accomplices, according to the records, there was no indirect action that led to the murder. Nor was he a co-accused who was not commanding because the person to whom he was made was his own co-accused, under the circumstances. pakistani advocates Kohistan lawyer