Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ARSHAD ALI versus THE STATE


The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b) definition of evidence was not mentioned in the FIR and the names of the accused were provided by the complainant in their supplementary statement, appearing in the FIR 15 days after the incident. The motivation for the incident was quite different. In the complaint filed by the accused's widow, the five accused in the case were acquitted by the trial court; medical evidence did not support the testimony of the accused; Has not forwarded the case to the prosecution There was no independent autocorrelation of the ocular account on record to maintain the conviction of the accused. The State Councilor rightly confessed to the defense lawyer's offer. ?

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Ranipur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.