Find a Lawyer

MIAN MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ SHARIF versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD

Article 14 (3) (c), 12 (2) and 13 of the Martyrs (10 of 1984) Article 84 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution nominations for election petition Section 12 (2) Representation of the People Act, 1976 The candidate, along with his proposer and secondly, had declared it necessary to keep his signature on the nomination papers; in the present case, the candidate's signature, on the nomination of his papers, the candidate is not genuine during the relevant period. He was overseas and failed to establish the sending of nomination papers from Pakistan in the said country and there was nothing to record that he had The nomination papers were returned to Pakistan and the same was submitted before the Returning Officer. Candidates could not establish that their affidavits were clearly signed by him abroad, tiled before the Election Tribunal, The statements of the candidates were received in the affidavit in Pakistan and MXIX, with their nomination papers, stated that they were in the same position before the Commissioner, while in the date of verification of the statements, the candidates were admitted abroad. Which further proved that the nomination papers of the candidates were signed. There were no cases and the candidates never appeared before the Election Commissioner Election Tribunal, exercising the legal jurisdiction involved, scrutinizing and comparing the candidates 'alleged signatures on nomination papers with the candidates' approved signatures. What. His authorized letters, and found that he did not have any similarity, which was the subject of the Election Tribunal, family advocate from Minchanabad lawyer