Find a Lawyer

MIAN MUHAMMAD RAFIQ SAIGOL versus TRUST MODARBA

O XXI, R 58 The jurisdiction of the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction while inquiring into the claim referred to in the objection claim, the jurisdictional lawyer arguing that the disputed property was not in favor of the judgment which in fact gifted it in 1992 I gave, and therefore, the property could not be enclosed or sold by executing the decree passed against the accused counsel for judgment, the banking court had neither acted on contempt of court / stand on behalf of the petitioner and Neither was it considered while excluding objections to the documents submitted by him. The Banking Court dismissed simply because the applicant had failed to present a registered gift process in support of his claim, the valid order of the Banking Court was based on the view that there was no other way of crime in Islamic law. Was. Except that such a view of the Banking Court by the Registered Gift Dead was irrational, which was not recognized by the established PR, the strength of the law and the gift was also against the principles of Islamic law regarding the Banking Court, In the present case, without any inquiry and without condoning the records on the record and immediately disappearing the facts of this case and the law. To conclude that the confession about the gift of disappointing auction proceedings is a shameful and fraudulent transaction, the banking court could not come to that conclusion unless both parties were provided with sufficient opportunity to present evidence. ? The Banking Court, while rejecting, had put aside the objection request and decided on the objection request. divorce advocates from Tarbela lawyer