Find a Lawyer

NIAZ AHMAD versus THE STATE

Section 2 302 Constitutional Evidence (1984 of 10 of 1984), Review of Evidence In a house equipped with a pistol declaring the death, he announced that he would teach his wife a lesson on bullying and abusing her. Walking on the right side of his neck and the color of his neck, two witnesses arrived on the spot, they tried to catch the suspect, but he managed to escape and was told that two people were killed a month after that. And three days later he died, the victim's statement was a complete dying declaration. He is qualified and only after that the policeman recorded his statement that the court was initially told that he was not aware of the incident at all, he was declared as a harasser and his behalf was transferred by the state. The investigation was carried out, as well as cross-examination of the defense lawyer, which revealed that one of the prosecution's witnesses was admittedly a close relative. The accused, in addition to his uncle as well as his father-in-law, while he had no relationship with the complainant, also proved that the second witness of the prosecution had a close relationship with the accused and his witness had no relationship with the woman. No, it is evident that the statement was appealed to the police to negate the presence of such witnesses, however the record proved that as well as cross-examination, it was said that the witnesses The relationship is with the accused, and they have won and his contradictory statement was issued. An honorable witness had to look in the light of the circumstances of the case and then find out that inheritance advocates near Usta Mohammad lawyer