Find a Lawyer

KAPUR TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED versus BANKERS EQUITY LIMITED

Sections 12 and 9 (4) of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), A XXXVII, R2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) were issued suit for recovery of money, after filing a lawsuit. The summons was issued for the purpose of the verdict. The case was required under the law and subsequently its publication was published in leading newspapers but no record was produced which passed this order on this day in any trial court. Was not presented, nor was a leave application filed to defend the case. , And the banking court ordered the lawsuit filed under section 9 (4) of the Banking Companies (Debt, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Finance) Act 1997 and as A XXXVII, R 2, CPC The affidavit was filed as an affidavit and a trial was requested to be canceled on the grounds that the defendant's correct address was not given to the plaintiff, therefore, according to law Not served, the High Court dismissed the petition. Of the extent to which the defendant was, in fact, the defendant, was served, and it was stated that the courts below did not consider the matter in its original context: that the order of separation of the decree The request for the petition was timely and the decision of the superior resulted in a misunderstanding of justice and that the defendant had informed the plaintiff (bank) about the change of address, which clearly shows the essence of the facts. That the court had properly adopted the defendant's services to the defendant and to the defendant himself. Danish filed an application before the court to reject the former party decree which the High Court affirmed. pakistani advocates Abbaspur lawyer