Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. SARDARAN versus SULEMAN


O XLI, R 27 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Extra Evidence Proof of Relationships with Parties The unnecessary copy of the National Identity Card format was removed by the Appellate Court on the ground that the entries in the national form broke the Identity Card. Was scrapped and some matters were not clear The appellate court order was upheld by the High Court under the jurisdiction of the review, certified copy of the copy of the form prepared in the evidence is not a certified copy issued by the concerned department. Rather it was a document submitted by the applicants. From their own possession, therefore, such a document cannot be allowed to be presented in evidence which had no authenticity; the relevant facts of the finding of the following facts about the relationship by the relevant courts should be read inaccurate material. Or was found to have not read any proof material. The appeal was denied on leave

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Akhora Khattak lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.