Articles 9/10, 25A and 32 (c) (d) of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999, resolving disputes, payment of debts etc. Section 25A of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 fulfills only a limited purpose ? And the rights and obligations between the bankers and the lenders can only be determined by the banking courts. Was done and to no avail. Affect the power of the competent banking court to determine the rights and obligations of the parties When a substantial dispute over the existence of the obligation was pending before the competent court, it is not appropriate for any party to deliberately defaulter. Will be. If, for the purpose of criminal prosecution, the accused had filed a case after the guilty plea, then the trial of the guilty was commenced. It may be concluded that such action was only carried out through a forest capture effort and no stay was justified, however, the defendant's case for recovery was a premature bank case. As well as its announcement. NAB ordinance proceedings under the NAB Ordinance, therefore, unless the accused is found liable to pay any money to the bank and there are defaulters in such payment as per the provisions of the Ordinance Procedure before the Accountability Court. Should be stopped.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
