Find a Lawyer

ALAMDAR HUSSAIN versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB

Article 212 (3) Date of Birth, Correction of Government Employee Principle Complaint was that the year of his birth was inadvertently recorded 1939 instead of 1941 but for the first time in 1998 the correction was attempted which was taken by the authorities of the department. Was rejected. Also the service tribunal provided by the civil servant was that he was performing service in East Pakistan and due to lack of proper records in his history his service record was mistakenly entered into the relevant rules. The public servant could not pray for the correction of his birth two years after joining the job. If the public servant makes a valid claim about his / her birth date, he will not be able to pray for correction of his birth within two years after his arrival. Should have taken action. East had returned from Pakistan and if it was not possible then at least within the appropriate date, its date should have been aggravated to correct the birth. That the public servant was satisfied with his date of birth, because he did not challenge him at an early stage, because the public servant was fully aware of such enrollment in his service record, despite having received the knowledge that his date of birth was annual. According to secret reports, the civil servant did not protest against such registration as, by his conduct, he could not be allowed to change his position after a very long period of time when the Supreme Court upheld the service. Refused to interfere with the tribunal's decision. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer