Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of Office of Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 129 and 156 of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), filed by the Issuing Officer within 30 days from the date of appeal decision of the Appeal Commissioner in filing Section 9 appeal. And the Income Tax Commissioner (Appeal) may delay and grant an order on the merit Appellate Authority held that the Appellant was unable to provide any compelling reason. The explanation for not filing an appeal by the Federal Tax Ombudsman, however, is that the delay in filing an appeal is out of control as the order of the Federal Tax Ombudsman was taken from the Federal Tax Ombudsman Office on October 19, 2001. 3 2001 and it was received by him on 16 3 2001. The Validity Appellate Authority did not mention the reason in his order. The complainant has filed notice of delay in filing the appeal and has summarized it. That the appellate authority had no reason to file the appeal late because the appellate authority's order mistakenly requested the petitioner to submit the petition and condolences due to the delay in filing the appeals. Have to be Delays were ignored The Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that the appellate authority certify its jurisdiction under section 156 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and consider the delayed filing of the appeal, along with the reason for the delay. The Registrar's Office of Federal Tax was required to establish a delay in sending a decision to the Ombudsman and to give notice to the person responsible for the delay as a result of his findings on literacy and by law. investigation inheritance advocates near Khangah Sharif lawyer