LIAQAT HUSSAIN versus FALAK SHER
Articles 302/34 and 392/34 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) against the eyewitnesses, including the complainant, failed to present an understandable and acceptable explanation as to why the incident was present. And the witness of the occasion was the prosecution case. Unable to inspire confidence and unable to understand the potential voice for a man of reasonable wisdom, in such cases, the accused's prosecution could not offer any useful assistance in the prosecution's case, the High Court found on the ground that there was no Was rightly suspected. At that time, only one bullet was fired by the High Court, neither had it been presented before nor the appeal to appeal the serious leave was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Head Marala lawyer
