Find a Lawyer

SHAFIQ AHMED versus MEPCO WAPDA

Sections 26A, 39, 39A and 44 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, were charged with tampering with a meter, cutting off electricity from electricity and removing a power meter, without authority. The power supply is disconnected from any information. In his premises and his electric meter was removed for the purpose of turmoil, the Authority opposed the request that the applicant was given a notice with the notice that the checking meter in his premises was tampered with. The tamper was found and the applicant was requested to appear. Within seven days as to why the premises should not be disconnected, and the evidence on the record that the meter was removed, the evidence on the record proved that the applicant's premises were disconnected and the metric was issued before the notice was issued. Was removed and even the notice was not connected to the meter or removed. Service of notice according to which the applicant was instructed to show cause against the issuance of the disclosure bill and that WA should also be associated with the Detection Committee with all relevant records in connection with the preparation of the tracking bill. "In the circumstances, the search bill was not proved, the applicant was prepared without notice and without his association in the search committee," he said. Describe the basis on which it was developed and the applicant's premises to be disconnected, the removal of meters, the filing of an FIR, the issuance of a detection bill against the applicant, and a notice to an applicant. Without the authority's action in issuing a bill to detect it list of supreme court advocates from Gari Habibullah lawyer