Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus THE STATE

In reviewing the evidence of section 2 (b (b)), the affirmative evidence without trust was affirmed by the testimony of the other deceased, whose presence was immediately resident of the area and false against it. There was no cause for deportation. The suspect who left the real culprit to go scot-free had also confirmed ocular testimony with medical evidence, the recovered blood stained ground had been established at the scene and the accused confessed to the motive. After being released from the clutches of the victim, he could easily be found. The escaped suspect did not even target the complainant and his brother, whom he accused of threatening to wear a butcher's knife. list of supreme court advocates from Phagwar lawyer