Find a Lawyer

NAZIM, UNION COUNCIL NO.6, KARACHI SOUTH versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL, SADDAR TOWN, KARACHI

Sections 14 (J), 16, 18 and 18 of the Sindh Local Government Election Rules, 2000, R 16, 18, 81, 83 and 86 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution nomination papers rejected nomination for selection of nominee The Returning Officer was rejected by the Returning Officer, the candidates were dismissed as their choice and the nomination papers were rejected by the opposing candidates to get the next highest number of votes. It was reported that the deputy candidate was declared defaulter in payment of bank installments. The basis for rejecting the nomination papers was challenged on the grounds that the candidate was not deliberate. Disqualification of the deputy nominee's candidate will not negatively affect the candidate of the nominee. In the event of disqualification of both candidates, the defeated candidates were not allowed to hold the post of successor of the candidates, but by applying to the applicants of Section 18A of the Sindh Local Government Election Ordinance 2000, by-elections for the new set. Were to be The allegedly defaulted defaulter about the legitimate candidate sought the bank's facility, but failed to return the money to the bank, which had to file a lawsuit against the candidate to recover the money, the candidate admitted. It was his responsibility to submit the nomination papers. The salary amount and the Banking Court had passed the order against him, in which case he could not say that he was not a decree holder of Section 16 of the Sindh Local Government Election Ordinance, 2000 requiring that the Nazim and As Deputy Joint Candidate patent advocate from Rabwah lawyer