Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD MAHMOOD versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Section A 69A [As amended by Punjab Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Ordinance (XLVI of 1999)] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 18, 25 and 185 (3) Section 69A, Questions regarding the Constitution of Provincial Motor Vehicles Act , 1965, and its dispute, if any, with the leave of appeal of Articles 18 and 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan, the Supreme Court approved to consider these questions of law whether the Provincial Motor Vehicles Ordinance, 1965 Under what section does section 69A be inserted? The Provincial Ordinance XLVI of 1999 was in the public interest and was not in violation of the Constitution's guarantee of trade and business in Article 18 of the Constitution and furthermore that the Monopoly and Compulsory Trade Practices (Control and Prevention) Ordinance ( V of 1970); that the addition of section 69A to the Provincial Motor Vehicles Ordinance, 1965, does not amount to protecting and promoting the interests of a particular class by earning the majority of the people belonging to the transport business to their legitimate rights. And they didn't. Denying equal and equitable opportunities for business rights provided under the Constitution; the exclusion of wagons and minibus owners from the transportation business under the Franchise Routes Scheme does not preclude the policy of the Independent Competition and these people Is not to prevent the right to use the vehicle of your choice. Transporting and forcing them to travel by franchise transport. That the free trade and commerce imposed sanctions was not a social and economic exploitation, as provided in Article 3 of the Constitution, and that the provision of section 69A to exclude wagons and mini-buses from the staged franchised routes. Shaw as Carriage tax advocates from Tall lawyer