Find a Lawyer

ASHIQ HUSSAIN ALIAS NANNA versus THE STATE

Section 2 302 (b) read with evidence 7 Section Definition of evidence Private defense, right to the burden of proof, date and time, as well as the weapons used in it, were also confessed by the parties and the accused did not. Only confessed to his presence and participated in the alleged incident but he also confessed that he was the person who shot and killed the accused, though he pleaded for the exercise of the right of private defense but he Failure to discharge this responsibility was entirely unsuccessful. In this case, the accused was hurt by the deceased at the time of the incident, but no knife / dagger allegedly taken by the victim at the time of the incident was recovered from the spot or by the person or clothes. The victim and no witness were offered evidence that he supported the suspect or confirmed that he shot the victim only after he attacked with a knife / dog. By mistake, two questions were of the utmost importance, namely, who has done the job and secondly that the person doing it has any legal or legal justification to do so even though the first question Although the responsibility of the evidence was always the prosecution, but the moment when an accused confessed to killing the deceased under any circumstances, the prosecutor's work on this general matter was automatically dropped and then the grip of the evidence was independent. The defense moved to establish what is the legal or factual justification that the accused person accused of killing the deceased factot It may not have been proved that when an accused person requested a general or special exception, we would not how to become a advocate from Ugoki lawyer