Find a Lawyer

IMTIAZ AHMED LONE versus UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

CL 34 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Candidates who emigrated from the Institute of Internal Kashmir and obtained 521 out of 1100 marks in FC Pre-engineering, which was the rule for the exclusion of the local-occupied candidate. Was registered as a student. He was issued a video letter and began attending his classes, but about four months after his admission, he was expelled from the university on the grounds that his numbers in FC engineering were for university admissions. Were less than the minimum standards. The prospectus of the University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, could only be removed if a candidate was temporarily admitted and any documents or certificates filed by him were false, fake. Or was fabricated. The candidate filed by the candidate was found to be inaccurate, fake or fabricated; it cannot be said in the circumstances that the candidate was guilty of any of the actions mentioned in Section 5 34 of the University Prospectus, so that the FSC Given the option of excluding the issue of getting a low score, the candidate must be examined by the university before admission and then the rules of the Luxury Penitentiary will not apply. Candidate, could not be expelled from the country by the University High Court as per the order of the University under which the candidate was expelled from the University. immigration advocates contact from Kamalia Musa lawyer