CH. KHURSHED AHMED, ADVOCATE versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
Punjab Local Councils (Audit) Rules 1981 R27 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of Pre-surcharge proceedings against the District Council lawyer keeping in view the rules of the Constitution. Mazzi, in the presence of his counsel (applicant) of the District Council, disposed of the constitutional application on the same terms on which the previous constitutional petition was decided, and the High Court's decision on the transparency of the terms contained therein. The court was stopped by the Supreme Court. And it was said by the applicant (lawyer) that the Supreme Court was convinced that such an agreement was fair and equitable with both parties and that its terms could not be executed by any court, much less. The district council's audit officer has the legal authority to terminate such powers. The Supreme Court observes, unless a case of fraud, misrepresentation or lack of jurisdiction is properly presented in the proceedings constituted Section 12 (2), the CPC either to the High Court or the Supreme Court. It was filed in court so that the order could be questioned on such a basis that nothing was in the record to ascertain how the applicant (lawyer) was responsible, when he was after a long time in the District Council. Had joined the post of Such an order was imposed. The High Court accepted the constitutional petition and declared the proceedings initiated against the petitioner (lawyer) to be without legal authority.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
