MURID HUSSAIN ALIAS MURAD KHAN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, CHINIOT
Articles 5, 7, 14, 17 and 21 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964, Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Appeal for the recovery of dowry against the decision of the Family Court, the family court, deciding the case by the plaintiff's husband. After the appointment of a referee suit was filed against him, a referee was appointed with the consent of the parties during the appeal and it was agreed that the decision on the referee's statement based on the oath of the Quran and the decision of the Family Court. An appeal will be decided against the order. Weeks after the appointment, the referee appeared in court and gave his statement on the oath regarding the list of articles concerning the dowry that the defendant's husband had filed, the defendant filed a request to cancel the referee's appointment, after which the referee's The statement was recorded and it is said that the case should be decided on merit, the appeal was rejected by the appellate court and the appeal was decided on the basis of the statement of the referee who did not add any Referees made with the consent of the parties did not prove this objection within approximately seven to seven weeks. The designated referee was partial to the defendant and had also cooperated with him to cooperate with it. Unless the referee's statement was contrary to that, the appellate court's decision could not be allowed to be dismissed on the basis of reasonable reasoning, and there was no illegal proceeding, so it could not be construed as a constitutional jurisdiction. Could not interfere with the use of the car by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
