Find a Lawyer

MST. NOOR KHATOON versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI

Civil Code 1908 Section 115, O VI, R 17 & O XX, R 18 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The defendants of the suit division opposed the suit which was claimed. He owns the suit property. The plaintiff, by the preliminary injunction declaring the plaintiff as the owner of the 7th / 8th section through the trial court, filed a revision petition before the High Court requesting the injunction made in her favor by the preliminary injunction. The order was affirmed by the appellate court's plaintiff during the hearing. To keep records of some documents as additional evidence to show that the suit property was transferred in his name in 1978, as being the evacuation property. The High Court did not approve such request and dismissed the review request. There was an eviction property, but he said in his written statement that his mother, having been the exclusive owner of the suit property, had been acquitted with the will in 1949, neither in the suit property, nor in the written statement. And at no other stage did the defendant deny that he did not know about the jambundi admissions on the vacant property interest, thus preventing him from setting a new case before the High. had gone. The court, or the Supreme Court, has challenged the trial court's decision and affirmed by the Appellate High Court's decision that it is not subject to any legal or factual weakness. law firms from Sukkur lawyer