Find a Lawyer

MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED versus KHABEER TRADING CORPORATION

Transfer of the case due to a change in law from one banking court to another in the banking court for the collection of AIX, R 2 banker and customer suit loans, transferred by the banking court to the banking court, presided by the banking court on 21 12 1992 Under the order issued for the officer of the court was on leave on 10 2 1993 and the case was adjourned for 5 5 1993 the banking court issued notice to the plaintiff on receipt of the price in 6 199 1993 and the plaintiff was instructed. Was required to collect student expenses within a week. It was stated that the court repeated this order till 12 order 1993, the plaintiff failed to present the processing fee within a fixed period, ie, 3 199 days in 3 days and the case was adjourned till 7 2 1994; Was dismissed as a plaintiff. According to the notice issued by the court which failed to submit the process fee as per its 199 199 order, the defendant's legitimate services did not have effect when the court issued the notice that the plaintiff was not required to be discharged. Abandonment of processing fees The plaintiff in the post-banking court order was instructed to submit a process fee after 21-12 1992 to issue notice to the plaintiff. No one should be fined for the principles of law. Because the IX, R 2, CPC judicial provision is not mandatory, its rigorous application was not guaranteed and the court was not obliged to approve the dismissal order, within 3 days by the Banking Court. The final order for filing a process fee was unapproved; in law when the basic order was not sustainable in the eyes of the law, then the super structure would have to fall to the ground, imposing a penalty imposed under OJX, R2. The CPC filed a court order divorce advocates from Bhakkar lawyer