Find a Lawyer

MUZAFFAR IQBAL versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 (b), 324 and 109 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), section 7 (3) were defined in a lawyer's chamber and the accused was the clerk of the Advocate complainant who was the son of the victim. The aforementioned advocate and complainant were both jurors who were natural eye witnesses, giving constant statements on every material detail. Another spectacular witness, who was a petitioner and worked in the court premises, also appeared in the chamber when the incident occurred. All the witnesses are consistent with what happened and how it happened and the arrest of the caller account and the suspect. Medical evidence was confirmed on this occasion, and with the recovery of the pistol pistol, a forensic science expert was sent and received the information. And the pistol was linked to the crime, the provocative part of the prosecution's story was proved not only by the prosecution's witness, but also in the confession that N had made in his statement under section 234 under, in his request for CC Defense. It is alleged that he was mistakenly trapped because of a strained relationship between him and his wife, the victim's daughter, so the first action was not practicable because the complaining party had taken the path of legal action. ? By filing a lawsuit against the perpetrator who was adjourned before the court's authorized jurisdiction. Secondly, the general account of the prosecution case was presented by independent witnesses, who had no connection with the complaining party nor had any enmity with the accused in making false accusations with him. Third, the arrest of the accused on the occasion of any misidentification or substitution case law firms from Kotla Pathan lawyer