Find a Lawyer

AZHAR HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL

A. XXXVII, Rr. 1 and 2 negotiable instruments for the collection of money on the basis of disputed assumptions Act (XXVI of 1881), section 118 (a) Stamp Act (II of 1899), section 2 (22). Section 118 (a)) through negotiation Act, 1881 gave rise to a negotiated settlement of each negotiating instrument which stated that the document was carefully considered and implemented by the defendants, the present case. I agreed to sign the agreement and receipt once it was recognized that the document / negotiation tool was implemented between the parties, this legal speculation on which the document was considered It was intended to come into existence and the plaintiff did not have to direct any evidence to substantiate it, however, the speculation was rejected and the defendant was asked to defraud or to appeal the instrument. He did not intend to be the source of the conversation or could have pleaded for another matter, but such a request had to be raised in his written statement and then he had to prove the evidence through the defendant. Made only a request that the seeker and the receipt were never processed, that the defendant in his statement had processed the document The defendant admitted that the defendant, admitting that the defendant had accepted the execution, was worth considering, in the circumstances. advocates from Sarai Alamgir lawyer