Find a Lawyer

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,, FAISALABAD versus NAZEER AHMAD AQEEL, ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, FAISALABAD

Section 3 523, 5050 && 1 561 For theft of a stolen property, an application under section 1 561A, CCPC, in the case of superintendence of a vehicle approved by a court magistrate and a session judge. The request was stolen. This, it is an insurance company and after paying the owner certain amount, he had set a locus standi for the possession of the vehicle, the courts requested that the applicants were refused the car on superdrive, the magistrate refused to give it. Could deny. The applicant had the vehicle supremacy but the court had to take some positive steps to ensure that the vehicle was taken to the police station / ALQ Magistrate where the FIR was registered so that the seized property could not be occupied by the officers. ? Indefinitely and the damages and damages courts rescued, not doing so defeated the very rational argument behind section 2323 the, the PC orders of the courts were set aside. The petitioner of the High Court was instructed to appear before the magistrate on the due date, adopting proper legal procedure to ensure that the property was safely transported to the relevant police station so that the police of the said police station already. He will create The Alexa Magistrate, where the law was stolen for action, may ask the Magistrate to join the police in the exercise and set a date for his preparation before the Eliza Magistrate, who will mention his recovery. From the date mentioned by the magistrate. Time and law will move forward top advocate from Sara e Naurang lawyer