Find a Lawyer

SHAMAS-UD-DIN KHAWAJA versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

The Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 Rr 6, 5 and 4 Service Tribunals Act, (LXX of 1973), Section 4 mandatory retirement inquiry procedure is to be fully inquired under which a competent officer is charged And have to be aware of that. The accused public servant has clearly stated in R6 (1) (2) of the statement of the allegations leveled against him, the Government Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1973, that the accused officer is less than 7 days or more than 14 days. Period will be provided. It is a fact of hand-inquiry, to present your defense, oral or documentary evidence, and to review witnesses against it, the procedure laid down in Rule 6 (1) against a civil servant. Can't be equal to 2) (3) The rules are to keep convincing and reliable evidence on record, which can safely prove the allegations leveled against a civil servant and only then can the mandatory retirement search be retrieved. When the prosecution was initiated only on the basis of a criminal charge, which was subsequently not proved by the competent law court and consequently, it was acquitted, the order of the service tribunal was upheld by the department's mandatory retirement order. After being placed, the Supreme Court set aside. The court immigration advocate from Dera Bugti lawyer