Find a Lawyer

MST. NUR BEGUM versus SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, MULTAN

Parts II, Paras 7 (5) and 13 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 Temporary Allotment Preferential Right of Land Allotment in favor of the Appellant On this basis, the Settlement Commissioner requested a review by the Defendants. Allowed Due to the temporary allotment of the allottee, the appellant will not be appreciated by the relatives and, as a married woman, will lose the allotment of land under para 7 (5) of the West Pakistan Rehabilitation and Settlement Scheme. And that another appellant has a diminished right of the respondents, who should be preferred to the extent of some units, that the High Court had violated paragraph 13 because of the transfer of his advance claim in the disputed village. Dismissed the constitutional application filed by the appellant on. One of the rehabilitation and resettlement schemes, therefore, will have no right to allotment in this village. The status of the legitimate position on the record appears to be different from the order of the Settlement Commissioner, which was not a sustainable RL II on record, indicating that the name of the defendant as a proposed landowner unit in the land was canceled. Was made and was not a temporary allotment in the village on the date of the settlement request by the Settlement Commissioner. And the other respondents' claim was completely satisfied and there was nothing left in the village to accommodate the appellant's preference in order to show that the transfer of the units of appeal in the village was either ineligible. The officer made or was that such an objection to the record was not raised by the parties at any stage, nor was the Settlement Commissioner, who was the owner of the respective records. online advocate from Muzaffargarh lawyer