Find a Lawyer

HAMID ALI KHAN versus KHALID MUMTAZ

When forfeited amount to Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Sections 55 and 62 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 113 suit for the specific performance of the contract to sell the contract canceled. Millie, the sale was executed when the contract was signed, while the balance consideration was payable up to 1981. 1981, the defendant sought to seize the suit house in September 1981, at which the plaintiff's wife initiated the criminal proceedings. Whether the plaintiff was convicted in such proceedings and filed a criminal appeal. The High Court defendants were acquitted on 23 4 1989 as a result of an agreement / agreement between the parties so that the defendant would execute the sale offense in favor of the plaintiff 28 Pla 1989 for the execution before the plaintiff 28 28 1989. The stamp paper was purchased. The sale proceeded, but the defendant began to perform his / her due diligence on 28 4 1989. After that the defendant refused to comply with the sale deed, to which the plaintiff filed a contempt of court petition and Subsequently, the present trial trial court ruled that the defendant had not sought nor established the plaintiff's contact with the plaintiff from 23 4 1989 to 28 4 1989. The date of the agreement / agreement cannot be declared 23 23 1989. , The defendant himself was in retreat for ten days and then the Eid holidays, along with the issue of filing a contempt of court petition against the defendant, along with the purchase of stamp paper, showed that the defendant was acting as part of his contract. Is ready and if the plaintiff intends to compromise, get the balance considered, then between 28 198 1989 and so on. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Digri lawyer