IBRAR HUSSAIN versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, GUJAR KHAN
Chapter 3, Part 4, Para 3 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition patwari, the selection of appointed patwari was a non-resident of the tehsil in which the appointment applicant was appointed, who was the candidate for the posts of Patwari, Their complaint was that, instead of selecting the patwari from the candidates for whom they were being recruited, other tehsils included in Chap 3, Part 4, Para 3 12 of the Land Records Manual The residents of the directions were selected and still present for decades, consistently following the goal of choosing one of the same districts. That it was the village official who was living at the lowest level in the revenue section of the province, responsible for collecting the revenue as well as providing the information necessary to record the revenue, some of which were intermittent. Were prepared and would be harvested according to some measles-like crops, and after that the benefit was to be recorded in the daily walkaty. Such a person had to have a close proximity. The record and other documents were to be prepared. The High Court observed that such long-term instruction could not be ignored, there were rules in writing qualifications. Appointments to the posts of Patwari and the rules and regulations must be strictly followed. In the matter of appointment of Patwari, the High Court directed the authorities to fill the vacancies with the applicants on the basis of their seniority position or their position in the list. Sub-division High Court-administered Patwar pass persons were further instructed to vacate in future
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Sidhnoti lawyer