DAYAM MIR versus GHULAM HUSSAIN SHAH
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 324/147/148/149 Bail, the cancellation of the accused's case was not the same as that of the co-accused. The principle of equilibrium was of no use to the accused, in the case of the accused, the roll was alleged to have injured a hammer to the head of the injured person to cause his death. Injuries to the fists and kicks and he was reportedly not equipped with any weapon The medical report confirmed the prosecution's case to the extent of injury to the head of the wounded weapon, the weapon of crime being an iron There was a hammer that could have killed a person. And the prosecution, whose superiority was found in the presence of the accused in the presence of the witnesses, referred the free persons as the prosecution witnesses found that the bail already given to the accused was canceled in the circuit.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Bajaur lawyer
