Find a Lawyer

SHAFFAT RASOOL CHAUDHARY versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 120, 59 (b), 50 (4), 100, 99 (1), 62, 63 and 156 CBR Letter No. ITB 3 (5) / 86, dated 3 7 1994 Federal tax. Establishment of Ombudsman Office (XXXV 2000V), Additional payment for late repayment amount under Section 50 (4) of Section 9 Ordinance, despite repeated requests for letters during 1994, 1997 and 1998 Order was approved on 15th, 2002 to determine the department's overpayment claim that the order of refund under section 99 (3) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 was made on this date and since the refund Order was approved on 15 3 2002, so Will be compensated. Section 100 of the validity of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 was amended in 1985, under which section 99 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 was filed where a refund request was made. I was created. The effect of the appeal by the Assessing Officer is necessary to confirm the deductions under section 59, 59 (a), 62 and 63 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, on the assessment under section. Ascii requested. In accordance with his letter dated 19 10 1994, the Assessing Officer, in order to allow credit for the deduction under section 50 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and thereafter to issue a refund immediately It was admitted that the said application is available on record as there was no order. This request was deferred within the bounds of the law as provided in section 156 (3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, the error reported by the complainant was considered valid from 30 1996 and the complainant property advocates from Digri lawyer