Find a Lawyer

AGHA GOHAR versus HASSAN MASOOD BAIG

Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Current Controller dismisses request for eviction by changing / adding rent payment and changing residential premises into commercial Yes, but it was accepted. The appellate court upheld the constitutional application filed by the tenants, proving that the tenant had already made a commitment to pay the rent, and changed the premises from residential to residential for commercial purposes. I had changed and increased, which was against the spirit. The local commissioner appointed by the tenancy controller had contracted the tenancy between the parties; the site inspection, with the consent of the parties, confirmed the landlord's argument that the tenant had built ten rooms on the lawn of the premises. Had damaged the premises and utilities. The same results from the rent controller were contrary to the evidence on record. No evidence or material was found to be illegal, irregular or misinterpreted or misreading of any form of law; there is no specific question of law of public importance in the decisions of the Appellate Court and the High Court which The Supreme Court verifies that when the court was involved, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and refused leave to appeal. divorce advocates from Shankiari lawyer