Find a Lawyer

ZAHID MAHMOOD versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b) / 459/34 evidence was applauded by the two accused in the FIR for their alleged intent to murder in connection with the firearms along with other accomplices. Were equipped. The suspect was the victim of a fireworks injury to the man killed in the back. Two witnesses who witnessed the incident, who were the victim's brother and cousin, both said witnesses who were present at the time of the incident. It was very natural to witness his presence in the light of the incident, Blood Syed said that the witnesses were naturally fired and given a version that was neither contradictory nor contradictory. The ocular account cited by both witnesses also differs from medical evidence, including the nature, location and duration of the injury as the eye witnesses stand. Medical evidence confirms that the long-standing enmity between the parties was the trigger for the crime and the commission of witnesses, both expected witnesses could fall into the category of interested witnesses and one must rely on the testimony of such witnesses. Looking for strong evidence on the evidence that the crime weapon recovered from the suspect was similar to the recovered items. Stood said the pieces of evidence were sufficient to provide adequate support to the account and to maintain the conviction, although 30 bore pistols were recovered on the offer of a co-accused, but available on record. The facts raised doubts about authenticity. Empty pieces of crime were recovered from inside a room of evidence where the deceased was found dead. advocate for immigration from Rawalpindi lawyer