Find a Lawyer

AZIZUR REHMAN versus SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.V

Section 8 (4) (5) (7) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution pleaded with the Labor Court to dispute the transfer of trade union officers that it did not have the authority to grant relief from termination. The change of officers has been reported by the Registrar of Trade Unions but it has the power to hold fresh elections directly. Accordingly, the Labor Court has appointed the Registrar to monitor / cancel / cancel fresh elections under the supervision of Trade Unions. Ordered to change office / office instead. Responsibilities were issued by the Registrar, Trade Unions after the Labor Court notification, despite the subsequent change in employees union officials recorded, there was no justification with the Registrar, the trade unions. Subsequent change, the Registrar, did not proceed to abolish / cancel / appoint trade unions in the sense that there is no jury, but Section 8 (4) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Under the provisions of (5) (7), the Labor Court was ordered to hold elections, which had jurisdiction to entertain and decide the appeals which would arise by the order of the Registrar of Trade. Unions where they not only refused to accept the change of trade union officials, but accepted a change if there was a dispute: the trade union Labor Court officials, in the circumstances, It did not arrive at the correct conclusion. The law governing the holding of fresh elections to the Union High Court under the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, the Registrar, the order of the trade unions best advocate from Padidan lawyer