Find a Lawyer

AKHTAR ALI KHAN versus THE STATE

Sections 173 and 561 of the petitioners' orders for the cancellation of the orders were filed against the policemen under the orders of the High Court approved in the constitutional petition FIR alleges that the policemen entered the applicant's house and opened the door. After the break and the locks seized a large amount of money and other valuable articles and handled the applicant's family, including the Ladies Investigation Officer, the FIR filed by the applicant is a false report by the Judicial Magistrate. Was allegedly taken before the session was sent to a judge. The accused had been specifically heard by the session judge and the session judge agreed with the report. An attempt was made to cancel the order of the session judge who, after taking possession of the matter, could have jurisdiction over the hearing. And may approve the appropriate order. Judicial Magistrate's authority to pass a Order Order Sessions Judge under Section 173 (3), CRPC Section 173, CRPC, was not provided for the sending of the Investigating Officer's report and by the Section Judge to the CCP Judge. The role of the session judge was not identified on the report under the RCR order passed. Without the jurisdiction of the Sessions Judge, the quorum was unauthorized; as there was no judicial judge, the judge was entitled to the jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 6161 AA, CCPC, under the order of the Judicial Magistrate. They were also sent to the High Court without any legal authority, which could be terminated by the High Court in the exercise of their powers under Section C by the CCPC, both orders canceled. power of attorney advocate Sajawal lawyer