Find a Lawyer

MUSTAFA TARIQ versus PERVAIZ AHMAD

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 Determining the age of the accused in appreciation of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Sections 2 (c), 4 (3) and 7 Evidence means having a child within the meaning of Section 2 (c) of the accused. Claims that the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000, applied for the determination of its age under section 7 of the ordinance on the basis of a school leaving certificate, according to which the accused for reference to the determination of the age of the medical superintendent was 18 years. Was a young medical board. The accused in his report stated that the accused was under the age of 17 and under 21. The complainant was again referred to the board for objection. The second report also stated that it was the accused's time in the incident. The trial court's decision as a partner under the age of 18 and separation from the accused in the case was revised, claiming that the petition filed by him was for the purpose of determining his age. The Judicial Justice System Ordinance, 2000, was exonerated in this application as it appeared in the clear reading of Section 4 (3) of the Ordinance Clauses of section 7 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000, even in the cases. The same can be requested. It was filed before the commencement of the ordinance stage, in which the matter related to the age of the accused was not stated in the Constitution, can be raised at any stage and the court is not obliged to record the medical board's findings. Controversially, the trial court properly excluded the accused's case after the accused was under 18 years of age female advocates from Quaidabad lawyer