UMAR MUJEEB SHAMI versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, ISLAMABAD
Sections 4, 9, 10, 12, 23, 24, 48 and 49 Registration of Printing Press and Publication Ordinance (XLVIII of 1997), Sections 7 and 11 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Declaration of Constitutional Request, Cancellation of District Magistrate Launched proceedings under the Printing Press and Publication Ordinance 1997 against the applicant, while running the previous parties against the applicant, it was declared that the petitioner's position was that the printing press and publication ordinance canceled the registration of 1997. Gaya and the West Pakistan Press and Publication Ordinance, 1963, were restored by the District Magistrate. Akstan Press and Publications Ordinance, 1963, section 4, 9, 10, 12, 23, 24, 48 and 49 would be illegal. According to the law, the district magistrate acted unlawfully under the same provisions of the printing press and public registration. The I-ordinance, 1997, which had expired a long time ago. The High Court clarified that because there is a gap in the law, the federal government, having constitutional authority, has the jurisdiction to resolve disputes in accordance with the Islamic Joint Law Order passed by the District Magistrate, which put the circumstances aside had gone.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
