ZIL-UR-REHMAN versus THE STATE
The testimony of the prosecution, which supported the prosecution's case, was examined by the trial court as a prosecution witness, although it was neither mentioned in the FIR as an eyewitness, nor the preliminary. The evidence was examined by the complainant and he did not even join the police investigation. Eyewitnesses involved in the FIR did not support the prosecution's case. The complainant was not an eyewitness who did not provide any explanation. Complaint was filed only three months after the incident, evidence of additional judicial confession was presented against the accused. In the case where no conviction could prove to be a crime, the empty recovery of the crime and the weapons were not supported, the prosecution was not supported by the witnesses it was alleged that they were suspected in the circumstances. Because of the evil.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Mehmood Kot lawyer
