Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAKOOR versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Appellants appearing in the Federal Public Service Commission's Rule C Section Section Examination for Competitive Examination were selected on the basis of the Punjab Domicile and were allotted to a postal group in which they appeared before the Appellant before the Federal Public Service Commission. I filed a representation, but when no order was passed on his representation, he presented it to the Chairman of Federal. The constitutional application was filed after the Public Service Commission which rejected the appellant, which was rejected by a single High Court judge against whom he had filed an Intra-Court Appellate Appellant, though the Act of 1972 was amended by the Law Reform Ordinance. Appeal is not sustained under the provisions of 3 (2), but no appeal, revision or review was provided for the competition under the rules of the Federal Public Service Commission Examination, in view of its R15, 996, infra. The Court of Appeal was adamant that the Chairman, against the reporting of the Federal Public Service Commission, filed his complaint before the Federal Public Service Commission. Petitioner, he could not say that the Chairman was not authorized by the Federal Public Service Commission After submitting a representation in the form of a review to the Chairman of the Federal Public Service Commission, the Appellant approved and approved the Rules of Response. But listen to the lace before him and decide, after he was dismissed, he resigned, so that he could be withdrawn from the post on the principle of waiver and temporary entry. The court's appeal, filed by the appellant, was unenforceable top advocates from Nankana Sahib lawyer